Email this article Social Engineering and Rural Development: How Society Participation through Financial Management and Village Potential [Rekayasa Sosial dan Pengembangan Pedesaan: Bagaimana Partisipasi Masyarakat Melalui Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Potensi Desa]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine community participation as a principle of good governance in implementing social change and rural development through village financial management and village potential. This research method uses a qualitative approach by observing and collecting primary data in the form of interviews with the community. The results of the study show that community participation in carrying out social change and rural development through village financial management is still not well implemented, it is because the existence of a fundamental problem from the community lies in the lack of knowledge regarding village regulations and policies. Whereas community participation through the management of village potential can be well implemented, due to mutual cooperation that has become a culture of the community. Social change needs to be done in increasing the potential and development of the village and there needs to be government intervention in facilitating and mentoring directed at the problems that exist in the community in conducting village management and developmentÂ
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baogang, H. (2002). Village elections , village power structure , and rural governance in Zhejiang. American Asian Review, XX, 55.
Dewi. (2013). Pengembangan Desa Wisata Berbasis Partisipasi Masyarakat Lokal Di Desa Wisata Jatiluwih, Tabanan, Bali. Jurnal Kawistara, 3(2), 117–226.
Ghony, M. D., & Almanshur, F. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (p. 25). Jogjakarta.
Indonesia Corruption Watch 2018
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas & Badan Pusat Statistik (2015). Indeks Pembangunan Desa 2014 Tantangan Pemenuhan Standart Pelayanan Minimum Desa
Liu, C., & Et, A. (2013). Project design, village governance and infrastructure quality in rural China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 5, 248–280.
Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. In Akuntansi Sektor Publik (pp. 17–18). Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.
Puspitawati, Y., & Rahdriawan, M. (2012). Kajian Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat Dengan Konsep 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) di Kelurahan Larangan Kota Cirebon.
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengelolaan Aset Desa
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 56 Tahun 2015 Tentang Kode dan Data Wilayah Administrasi Pemerintah
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 113 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 114 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pembangunan Desa
Peraturan Presiden No. 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) Tahun 2015-2019 Pembangunan Desa dan Kawasan Pedesaan
Rakhmat, J. (2000). Rekayasa Sosial Reformasi, Revolusi, atau Manusia Besar. In Rekayasa Sosial Reformasi, Revolusi, atau Manusia Besar (p. 44). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karaya.
Santosa, P. (2009). scholar (1).
Sujarweni, V. W. (2015). Akuntansi Desa, Panduan Tata Kelola Keuangan Desa. In Akuntansi Desa, Panduan Tata Kelola Keuangan Desa (p. 29). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Tan, Q. (2010). Why Village Election Has Not Much Improved Village Governance. Journal of Chinese Political Science Association of Chinese Political Studies, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-010-9095-1
Tjokroamidjojo, B. (2001). Good Governance. Paradigma Baru Manajemen Pembangunan. In Good Governance. Paradigma Baru Manajemen Pembangunan (pp. 78–79). Jakarta.
Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30874/comdev.2018.150
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Joko Hadi Susilo, Maulana Ghani Yusuf, Ryan Basith Fasih Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Proceeding of Community Development is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
