Email this article Participatory Governance in Development Planning Arrangement in Lubuk Sakat Village, Perhentian Raja District, Kampar Regency [Participatory Governance dalam Penyusunan Perencanaan Pembangunan di Desa Lubuk Sakat Kecamatan Perhentian Raja Kabupaten Kampar]
Abstract
One of the progress of the village is determined by the quality of its development planning. Development planning so far still leads to the practice of state-centered approaches. The community is "forced" to accept the results of development that have been carried out by the village government. Community participation and village institutions are often forgotten in the development planning process. This study tries to discuss and explain how the participatory governance model in making the Medium Term Development Plan (RPJM) Lubuk Sakat Village, Perhentian Raja District, Kampar Regency? This study uses a qualitative approach and collects data through interviews and document studies. The results of the study showed that the participatory governance model greatly assisted the village government in preparing the RPJMDes because it could allocate all resources from stakeholders to create village development planning policies. Furthermore, collaborative and participatory governance models can be used in the mechanism or stages of the village situation analysis (desk study) and SWOT analysis, identification of future needs, detecting needs and making strategies and action plans in overcoming problems in Lubuk Sakat village.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abers, R. (2001). Learning democratic practice: distributing government resources through popular participation in Porto Alegre, Brazil. The challenge of urban government: Policies and practices, 129-43.
Arun, S., Arun, T., & Devi, U. (2011). Transforming livelihoods and assets through participatory approaches: the Kudumbashree in Kerala, India. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3), 171-179.
Baiocchi, G. (2001). Participation, activism, and politics: the Porto Alegre experiment and deliberative democratic theory. Politics & Society, 29(1), 43-72.
Baiocchi, G. (2003). Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment. Dalam Fung, A., & Wright, E.O.(Eds). Institutional innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. The Real Utopias IV. London & New York: Berso, 45-76
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Daru, T. P., Yulianti, A., & Widodo, E. (2014). Potensi hijauan di perkebunan kelapa sawit sebagai pakan sapi potong di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Pastura, 3(2), 94-98.
Eyes on the Forest. (2016). “Legalisasi†Perusahaan Sawit melalui Perubahan Peruntukan Kawasan Hutan menjadi Bukan Kawasan Hutan di Provinsi Riau Laporan Investigatif dan Analisis Penginderaan Jarak Jauh di 26 Perusahaan Perkebunan Sawit. Diperoleh dari http://www.eyesontheforest.or.id
Gbikpi, B., & Grote, J. R. (2002). From democratic government to participatory governance. Dalam Grote, J. R., & Gbikpi, B. (Eds). Participatory Governance Political and Societal Implications. Leske & Budrich, Opladen: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 17-34.
Irma, W., Gunawan, T., & Suratman, S. Pengaruh Konversi Lahan Gambut Terhadap Ketahanan Lingkungan di DAS Kampar Provinsi Riau Sumatera. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 24(2), 170-191.
Isaac, T. T., & Heller, P. (2003). Democracy and development: Decentralized planning in Kerala. Deepening democracy. Dalam Fung, A., & Wright, E.O.(Eds). Institutional innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. The Real Utopias IV. London & New York: Berso Book, 77-110.
Koonings, K. (2004). Strengthening citizenship in Brazil's democracy: Local participatory governance in Porto Alegre. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(1), 79-99.
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 114 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pembangunan Desa
Qin, B. (2015). Sustainable Development in Rural China Field Survey and Sino-Japan Comparative Analysis. London & New York: Springer
Schmitter, P. C. (2002). Participation in governance arrangements: is there any reason to expect it will achieve “sustainable and innovative policies in a multi-level context�. Dalam Grote, J. R., & Gbikpi, B. (Eds). Participatory Governance Political and Societal Implications. Leske & Budrich, Opladen: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 51-69.
Sisto, R., Lopolito, A., & van Vliet, M. (2018). Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements. Land Use Policy, 70, 442-450.
Siswati, L., & Rizal, M. (2017). Peningkatan Pendapatan Petani Pertanian Terpadu Ternak Sapi Perah Dan Kelapa Sawit Di Kabupaten Pelalawan Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 20(2), 51-58.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods : A guidebook and resource 4th Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa
Williams, G., et al. (2011). Performing participatory citizenship–politics and power in Kerala's Kudumbashree programme. Journal of Development Studies, 47(8), 1261-1280
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30874/comdev.2018.347
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Auradian Marta, Leo Agustino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Proceeding of Community Development is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
